| Home » Categories » Protocols » Modbus |
I have multiple Modbus masters that need to communicate with 1 or more Modbus serial (RTU) slave devices. What product should be used?? |
| Article Number: 309 | Rating: Unrated | Last Updated: Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 3:06 PM |
|
The best option (straightforward implementation, most flexible option) would be the PLX31-EIP-MBS4 or the PLX31-MBTCP-MBS4. These gateways have four configurable serial ports that will allow data from 1 or more Modbus serial slave devices to be shared with multiple masters. |
Attachments (0)
There are no attachments for this article.
|
Comments
There are no comments for this article. Be the first to post a comment.
|
Do any Prosoft modules support Modbus UDP?
Viewed 1 times since Mon, Aug 24, 2015
Why is the bit or coil level data incorrect?
Viewed 1 times since Tue, Nov 28, 2006
What Modbus address would we need to put into the MODSIM32 simulator if we specified on the MVI56-MCM device address to 8680HEX (-31104 decimal) when the MVI56-mcm is the slave?
Viewed 1 times since Tue, Nov 28, 2006
I am trying to use a ProSoft Modbus solution to send/receive data to a MSA Ultima X gas dectection system with Modbus interface and am having problems. How can I resolve this issue?
Viewed 1 times since Thu, Apr 24, 2008
I have limited or no experience with Modbus. How can I find out more about the protocol and command structure?
Viewed 1 times since Tue, Nov 28, 2006
How can a module's Modbus port, configured as a Slave port, detect communication loss with the Master port?
Viewed 1 times since Tue, Nov 28, 2006
Defining the Slave ID when issuing Modbus Broadcast write commands
Viewed 1 times since Tue, Nov 28, 2006
How do you detect the individual Slave failure?
Viewed 1 times since Wed, Nov 29, 2006
How do I enter a Modbus address of 40001 or higher in the DevAddress command field of my MVI56-MCM?
Viewed 1 times since Tue, Nov 28, 2006
How can I detect the feedback status of individual command successful or failed?
Viewed 1 times since Wed, Nov 29, 2006
|

Add Comment